Elizabeth Holmes documentary: was the A24 meeting real?
The meeting where Billy Evans asks for a cut of the profits, and a later prison conversation, were both recreated with actors.
What might be the most important scene in the Elizabeth Holmes documentary, a meeting with executives from A24, was never filmed. It's a reenactment, and that one detail completely changes how you should interpret it.
The A24 meeting where Billy Evans asks for a cut was a reenactment
A24 is the studio financing the documentary. During a meeting with its executives, Holmes excuses herself to take care of her crying children. The moment she leaves the room, her partner, Billy Evans, starts demanding a percentage of the documentary's profits.
However, there's one important detail about that meeting that completely changes how you should interpret it: it wasn't filmed. The entire scene is a reenactment featuring Amanda Seyfried, who previously played Holmes in The Dropout. She appears alongside Christopher Abbott, who plays Billy.
Fielder's prison visit to Holmes was recreated too
And it doesn't stop there. Later in the documentary, Fielder visits Holmes in prison to ask her again whether she knew about the deal. Cameras weren't allowed inside, so once again he has Seyfried recreate their conversation.
During this reenactment, Holmes appears to acknowledge that she knew Billy had been discussing money with the filmmakers. That would suggest she wasn't quite as innocent as she'd been claiming.
Did Holmes say Billy was talking "about it" or "about something"?
Except Fielder starts questioning whether he remembers what Holmes said. There's a significant difference between her saying she knew Billy was talking to the filmmakers about it and saying she knew he was talking to them about something. Fielder can't remember which one she said.
One version suggests she knew about the financial arrangement. The other could mean she only knew Billy was talking to the filmmakers, without necessarily knowing what they were discussing. Suddenly, one of the most important questions in the entire documentary comes down to "a single word that Fielder isn't even sure he remembers correctly."
How do we know these conversations happened the way Fielder says?
That raises a much bigger question. How do we know any of these conversations happened the way Fielder says they did? We weren't there, and we certainly don't have any tapes of them.
Plus, we're seeing actors recreate conversations based on somebody else's memory. Once we see something dramatized on screen, it's remarkably easy to start treating it as something that really happened.
What other creators are saying
More on Elizabeth Holmes →I did not love the Elizabeth Holmes film with Nathan Fielder, but I would still nominate it for best picture
You Can See Everything review: performance art, not a documentary →
The film follows the Theranos founder and her partner Billy Evans in the 34 days before she went to federal prison.
Likely yes. The article suggests the mother may have no clipped into the Backrooms, which broke her mind and explains her paranoid fear of outsiders, though this is framed as a theory rather than confirmed fact in the film.
I break down which parts of the To Catch a Predator drama are fabricated, which are true to life, and how Chris Hansen himself has reacted
Watch the original
@breakdownsandblockbusters · YouTube
Adapted with AI from Breakdowns & Blockbusters' video of 5 November 2026 and checked against the video before publication. Editorial standards · Corrections
More from @breakdownsandblockbusters
All →Make videos? Your next one could be an article here.
We turn your videos into articles under your name, linked back to the original. You keep 60% of what they earn, non-exclusive, and you can leave whenever you like.
Become a SubPlotter →

