Frieza's five minutes on Namek: lie or honest miscalculation?
MatPat's theory on the Namek countdown in Dragon Ball Z gets the planet's density right, but the narrator and King Kai point to Frieza believing his own estimate
MatPat's Film Theory episode "Dragon Ball Z, Frieza's 5 Minutes Was NOT A Mistake" argues that Frieza lied about Namek exploding in five minutes as a piece of psychological warfare. I think the theory is mostly right, and its point about Namek's density is spot on. But I don't think Frieza was lying. I think he actually believed it was five minutes and it wound up being longer than that.
Frieza is my favorite character in Dragon Ball Z (1989), and I've been a fan of the series since I was a kid. MatPat's team has always had sharp editing, and he usually does decent research. That said, I didn't agree with his earlier Dragon Ball theory that the Kamehameha is plasma. I didn't see his Ultra Instinct Shaggy episode, so I can't comment on it.
Where the Frieza arc of Dragon Ball Z really begins
The theory places the Frieza saga at episodes 75 through 107. That is how Funimation's home releases, and some fan subs, split things up: a Namek saga, a Ginyu saga and then a Frieza saga. In reality the whole stretch counts as the Frieza arc, and the story begins in episode 36, right after Vegeta leaves and the characters start talking about going to Namek.
MatPat is wrong that they are on Namek in episode 36, though. That is when they discuss going. They don't reach Namek until the episode 40s, after the fake Namek detour and the space alien kids. Episodes 36 to 75 aren't filler either. Gohan, Krillin and Vegeta dealing with Zarbon, Dodoria and the Ginyu Force is all part of the story.
The theory also mentions Trunks screaming at Frieza in slow motion. In the Japanese version there's no screaming in that scene. It's all music and Trunks is muted, while the dub has a very long Eric Vale scream.
Cinematic timing explains the fighting, but not the talking
The most popular explanation for the stretched countdown is cinematic timing, the idea that the animators slowed the fight down so the audience can follow it. Dragon Ball has always done this. Akira Toriyama himself has explained in interviews that he has to slow fights down for his manga readers, especially with how ki blasts work, and the anime does the same.
The problem is the talking. Frieza and Goku talk back and forth a lot, and the theory counts 35 minutes of conversation with Frieza on the battlefield. That's why it can't really be five minutes, even though I do think the fighting is definitely truncated because of how fast they're moving.
Is Frieza an expert at timing planet destruction?
The theory claims Frieza is a pro who knows how much power and time each planet needs. I understand why MatPat says that, but there isn't enough evidence that he's an expert at timing how long a planet takes to blow up. We see him destroy Planet Vegeta and Namek, and presumably he has destroyed other planets, but we don't see them on screen. It's a theory.
The Namek material holds up. Namek is tidally locked with three suns, which is confirmed in the manga. Funnily enough, the manga panel used isn't from the official Viz translation. It's from an old fan translation from the late 90s and early 2000s, the one I read when I was younger, and you can tell by the font. I hadn't seen it in a very long time.
I'm less convinced by using Gohan's quick trips between the battlefield and the capsule as evidence that Namek is small. Gohan was much faster in this arc than before, so I don't think that point is relevant. Everything else on the density argument makes sense.
Planet Vegeta, the Super Saiyan legend and Dragon Ball Minus
The 448 planets figure for Frieza's empire is correct. But in the original Toriyama manga, Frieza destroyed Planet Vegeta because he was worried about the Saiyans ganging up on him in an uprising. The Super Saiyan legend was added in the same arc, with Toriyama changing his mind right as he was writing it.
Then in Dragon Ball Minus, the 2014 manga that introduced Goku's mother Gine, Frieza knew what Super Saiyan God was. It's a retcon, and I don't understand how Frieza knew about it, but it isn't a big deal.
Sun Tzu, Goku and Frieza's psychological warfare
Casting Goku as the improviser and Frieza as the strategist is fair to a point, but I don't think Goku is always that improvisational. He's a strategist in combat too. I see why MatPat says it, since Frieza had the upper hand for most of that fight.
The Sun Tzu quote about forcing an opponent to reveal himself is exactly what Goku does to Frieza in Resurrection F, and Vegeta does it quite a bit too. As for Frieza impaling Krillin on his horns to demoralize the others, I don't think they really were demoralized, because they kept going. Frieza always toys with his opponents, and a lot of Dragon Ball villains do that, which usually costs them.
The Piccolo section uses footage from episode 94 of Frieza in his final form. I'm guessing that was an editing mistake and MatPat meant the third form fight with Piccolo.
Frieza wasn't trying to break Gohan
The claim that Frieza forces Gohan to watch Piccolo's death to devastate him is completely wrong, and MatPat missed the boat on that one. In the original manga, when Frieza comes out of the crater after the Spirit Bomb, he targets Goku's friends to hurt Goku. He blasts Piccolo, thinking he killed him, then kills Krillin, then says the boy is next.
The anime is a little different, with Piccolo moving in the way and taking the blast. In the manga it's clear Frieza wanted to take out everybody to get back at Goku for almost killing him. His beef was with Goku, not Gohan.
Why I think Frieza believed his five minute countdown
MatPat's conclusion is that Frieza lied to rush Goku, like a chess timer forcing faster moves. That makes sense to a degree. But I still think it was a miscalculation. He intended to blow up the planet like Planet Vegeta, and the density stopped that. I could be wrong, but I don't think he lied about the time.
The narrator goes along with it, announcing two minutes left and then one minute left, and historically the Dragon Ball narrator doesn't go along with what Frieza says. I think King Kai goes along with it too. If Frieza were lying, you'd expect King Kai to say it would take longer. The only thing that makes sense to me is that they all thought it would be five minutes without accounting for the density.
With cinematic timing factored in, I don't think it was two and a half hours, but I do think it was much longer than five minutes. Something like 35 minutes, maybe more, makes sense to me, because Frieza hit the core, and that core takes time to blow up on a planet that dense.
Most of the theory was right and some of it was wrong. You can tell MatPat is more of a casual fan, but he did his homework for the majority of this, and there weren't tons of errors. I don't think Frieza was straight up lying, though maybe he was stretching the truth. I think it was more of a miscalculation, and that's always been my belief.
Watch the original
@geekdom101 · YouTube
Adapted with AI from Geekdom101's video of 23 January 2021 and checked against the video before publication. Editorial standards · Corrections
More from @geekdom101
All →Make videos? Your next one could be an article here.
We turn your videos into articles under your name, linked back to the original. You keep 60% of what they earn, non-exclusive, and you can leave whenever you like.
Become a SubPlotter →
