Supergirl reviews are wildly mixed as DC seeks its next hit
Critics are divided on Milly Alcock's performance in the new DC film, with reactions ranging from praise to disappointment.
The Supergirl premiere generated starkly different reactions from critics, leaving the film's box office prospects uncertain as DC looks to establish momentum under new leadership.
Following the film's world premiere, a wave of Rotten Tomatoes-approved critics weighed in with verdicts that ranged from enthusiastic to harsh. The disparity suggests the film may struggle to build the consensus momentum DC needs right now.
What Critics Are Saying
Praise centered almost entirely on lead actress Milly Alcock, with multiple reviewers calling her performance phenomenal. The quieter, character-driven moments, particularly between Alcock and David Krumholtz as her father, resonated with several critics.
Negative reviews focused on the film feeling generic and forgettable. One critic called it "a below-average Guardians of the Galaxy movie," citing thin plotting, Mad Max Fury Road visual similarities, and a lack of wit or charm. Another simply said the film was "mediocre" and "just okay," with nothing memorable to distinguish it.
The reviews were split enough that no clear consensus emerged. Some called it "a total blast," while others described it as "dull and underwhelming."
The Bigger Problem for DC
More concerning than mixed reviews is what they signal about the film's commercial viability. With a reported marketing budget around 100 million dollars, Supergirl will need strong box office performance to justify its investment.
The conversation around the film highlights a broader issue facing superhero cinema. Where films like The Batman and Spider-Man: No Way Home dominated, they succeeded partly through nostalgia and event filmmaking, bringing back characters audiences craved seeing again. Supergirl, while featuring a strong lead performance, doesn't carry that same draw.
"There's just not a lot of movies where you're walking out of going that movie was special," one analyst noted. The superhero genre, saturated since 2008, now requires films to feel genuinely exceptional to break through. Generic execution, even competent, well-acted generic execution, may no longer be enough.
What's Next for DC
Supergirl serves as DC's second major theatrical release under new creative direction. The studio needed overwhelmingly positive reception to signal to audiences and investors that the new vision was working. Mixed reviews suggest that won't happen.
The film's 107-minute runtime also drew criticism. Some felt the story was padded rather than purposefully shaped, leaving room for expansion on elements that actually worked rather than filler that didn't.
Whether Supergirl succeeds or fails at the box office, the mixed critical response underscores that superhero fatigue remains real, and that casting a charismatic lead actress, even one as talented as Milly Alcock, isn't enough on its own to overcome a script that feels familiar and forgettable.
Watch the original
@thekristianharloff · YouTube
Adapted with AI from Kristian Harloff's video of 23 June 2026 and reviewed by Digital Fox Talent before publication. Editorial standards · Corrections
Also on Movies
3 creators, 51 takes →More from @thekristianharloff
All →Make videos? Your next one could be an article here.
We turn your videos into articles under your name, linked back to the original. You keep 60% of what they earn, non-exclusive, and you can leave whenever you like.
Become a SubPlotter →




